Wednesday, November 2, 2011

The case for fiber-optic wiring of Libya



On August 20,  as news spread out that Tripoli was  liberated,  one of the signs that confirmed the happy news to city residents was the fact that the internet was back on. Before then and for obvious reasons, Big Brother considered the internet a sworn enemy and surfing it easily raised suspicion. As the revolution swept Libya this  past february, it did not take long before the main switch was turned off by LTT and an internet blackout was imposed on the country.

While there is every reason to believe the new Libya will have a different attitude towards internet freedom, a  recent protest at the LTT offices on the continuing low quality of  internet access service available in Tripoli, is bringing into focus the issue of wether the LTT is able to transform its image from that of a dictatorship tool, in the past used for communication monitoring and control,  to a communication and knowledge empowernment tool serving a free and democratic society.

As the sign carried by one of the recent Tripoli demonstrators rightly says, "Downloading is a right and not a luxury". The problem was reportedly triggered by the slow speed experienced by users of the LTT Wimax internet service. In the absence of a proper infrastructure, the system was hastily put in place by the corrupt ex-regime as a ragtag solution and its slow speed is most likely caused by its limited bandwidth and the increasing number of users, in a large city of the size of Tripoli.

While internet access is a citizen right in the first place,  it is also a vital infrastructure component for the national economy as a whole. An efficient broadband network covering the whole country is a pre-requisiste for ushering a new age of  e-education, e-government, e-health and e-commerce services which the new Libya, with its small  population and vast land,  badly needs. Imagine the savings of a good e-government system would offer if it is allowed to replace the cumbersome, corrupt and hopelessly inefficient bureaucracy  Libya has inherited and kept since Ottoman times. Countries such as Sweden and South Korea are at the top of rich nations partly thanks to their state of the art fiber optic networks connecting homes, schools, businesses and  government offices. Among Arab countries, the UAE was the first to take a bold step by introducing Fiber-To-The-Home (FTTH) systems, as early as 2007, covering major cities such as Abu Dhabi and Dubai.

Whereas Gaddafi  worked to build up his spy network of "revolutionary committees everwhere!", the new Libya government should work to build up a  citizen network enabling "internet access everywhere!". In a country where more than half the population is under the age of 20, an online knowledge-based education is essential for development. Since Libya is set to rebuild much of its city infrastructure destroyed by the recent war and by decades of neglect before that, this provides an opportunity for us to do things right from the start. One of the tasks the new government should do is to come up with a good five-year  master infrastructure plan, based on serious techo-economic studies and taking into consideration  factors such as future population gowth and distribution in Libya, modern architecture and greenary standards,  public transport requirements such as  metro and rail systems, and last but not least a nationwide-linked  fiber-optic network. Through  a re-organized LTT, entrusted with  information and communication technology (ICT), the government should focus on sponsoring, installing and maintaining the overall communication and information backbone  infrastructure  itself, and leave  internet service to a competition of private ISP providers so that an efficient and smooth customer service is assured.

During the early days of the revolution, timid efforts were made by the NTC to have a presence on the web and on social networks but perhaps due to lack of experience and resources, these efforts were not always very successful. The NTC website was and may still very well be not up-to-date and repeated efforts to contact the NTC by email failed to draw a single response. Now that a proper government is about to be in place, we hope that the prime minister and his ministers will have their official websites and will use them as channels for information and communication with the public and that officials will be accessible through their "gov.ly" email addresses.  In its quest to establish democracy, the new Libya cannot afford to neglect the role of these online and social media networks and  should make good use of all available channels to better  communicate with its citizens and indeed with the rest of the world.


Friday, October 28, 2011

A tale of two Libyas

As we drove to the "liberation day " party hosted by the Libyan embassy, my wife reassured me again that it would be a mixed party. At the entrance of the hotel, a few Libyan kids were jumping around noisily and waving the new colorful flags. As we entered the reception hall however, most women were seated separately and what was supposed to be a happy occasion turned out to be a succession of clerical sermons.

The program started with a long stand to the tune of the new national anthem, a bit repetitive and quite frankly too long. Cut it in half and it would still be too long!  A friend at our table decided not to continue standing in the middle of the anthem playing. He told me he was protesting the fact they were playing a version praising King Idris, Libya's conservative ruler who was overthrown by Gaddafi. There was of course a recital from the Koran followed by a sermon by an invited  guest cleric. He was said to be a well known "Alem" or religious scholar, but very few in the hall paid attention to what he said. Instead, most guests at the tables were having a chat among themselves. The turn finally came for the speech of the Libyan ambassador, a religious scholar and businessman turned diplomat, so I made an effort to listen. Unfortunately, it turned out to be more of the same, a sermon praising Allah for the success of the revolution but no more. As the monotonous program continued, a group of apparently disenchanted boys and girls started to play folklore songs on their own, to the beat of the darbouka, a libyan little drum-type. The organizers were not amused.

If anything, this small event reflects what awaits the new Libya. With the fall of the much hated Gaddafi regime, Libya has managed to dig its way out of a long and dark tunnel. However, many are worried that it may be headed towards yet another dark tunnel, this time engineered by conservative religious zealots who may be preaching a lot but can deliver little. Ironically, in the past, this religious zeal served Libyans well as an antidote to Gaddafi, a refuge from his absurd rule and in the end, a rallying faith which helped overthrow him.  However for the new Libya and the future of its young men and women, faith alone may not be enough. As the country tries to set its bearings at the start of a difficult journey towards a better future, it finds itself being pulled in two opposite directions. On the one hand, in the name of God, a conservative  mindset at the helm is taking matters into its own hands, prescribing virtue and resisting social change. On the other hand, an increasingly restless and long marginalized grass root of youth is fighting for change and yearning to join a much more modern world.



بورقيبة يشرح للقذافي


Tuesday, October 18, 2011

معركة ليبيا القادمة والأكبر ستكون ضد التخلف

لا شك أن النهاية الحتمية التي لقيها الطاغية والدجال معمر القذافي وأبناؤه القتلة على يد الشعب الليبي بعد عقود من الظلم هي نهاية يستحقها كل ظالم وإذ نرى الليبيين والليبيات  في كافة المدن  الليبية يحتفلون بهذا الإنتصارالتاريخي و بإسدال الستار على حقبة  مظلمة و طويلة في تاريخهم يبقى السؤال الأهم المطروح أمامنا جميعا   هو ما إذا كنا قادرين على الإنتصار في المعركة الكبرى والقادمة لا محالة ضد التخلف والفقر والفساد الذي ورثناه من حكم القذافي...وفي مايلي سرد لبعض ملامح  هذه المعركة:

  1. ليبيا بحاجة إلى بنية تحتية حديثة ومتكاملة بما في ذلك إعادة تخطيط  وبناء مدن دمرت بالكامل و ما يتبعها من احتياجات الكهرباء والماء والخدمات  يراعى فيها حسن التخطيط والذوق المعماري والتوسع الأفقي بدل التوسع الرأسي واتباع المعايير العالمية وتعد لها دراسات فنية و دراسات  جدوى  لا مجال فيها للعشوائية ولا تغفل فيها أمورحيوية مثل وسائل النقل الحديث كالمترو وشبكات المعلوماتية السريعة حتى لا نحتاج بعد ذلك إلى الحفر وإعادة الحفر  الذي عودنا عليه النظام الفوضوي السابق  والذي كان من بين أسبابه الجهل الفاضح بأمور التخطيط وسوء الإدارة.
  2. ليبيا بحاجة إلى تنويع مصادر الدخل فيها  بدل الإعتماد الكلي على النفط... بما في ذلك تنمية  قطاع السياحة وما يستلزمه من خدمات و دعاية و تعليم سياحي و توعية سياحية وبيئية وهي بحاجة إلى إيجاد فرص عمل لمئات الآلاف ممن حرموا في العهد المنهار من فرص العمل المثمر وفي نفس الوقت بحاجة إلى معالجة التكدس الإداري في دواليب الدولة وبدلا عن ذلك تشجيع القطاع الخاص وإزالة القيود والعراقيل البيروقراطية التي ورثناها من العهد العثماني.
  3. ليبيا بحاجة إلى الإستثمار الجدي في تعليم حديث مبرمج لتلبية احتياجات الإقتصاد الوطني لكي تعوض الحرمان الذي أصاب جيلا كاملا أو أكثر خلال حكم القذافي المتخلف...وهي أيضا بحاجة إلى تعليم مهني مبرمج هو الآخر لتلبية احتياجات إقتصادها. 
  4. ليبيا بحاجة إلى سواعد كافة شبابها ونسائها ومشاركة المرأة إلى جانب الرجل على قدم المساواة وإلى نبذ الأفكار البالية والمتخلفة التي تحاول تحجيم دورها... وهي بحاجة إلى بعث الحياة في طاقات أبنائها الخلاقة بتشجيع الفنون والآداب ونشر ثقافة القراءة و دورالكتب  بعد عقود الحرمان و التجهيل.
  5. ليبيا بحاجة إلى الإنفتاح على العالم و الإستفادة من تجارب الدول المتقدمة في بناء تعليمها وصحتها واقتصادها.

ولكي تضمن ليبيا الجديدة الإنتصار في معركة البناء  الكبرى هذه لا بد أن تدرك أن إختيار قياداتها  يجب ألايكون عشوائيا أو بناء على قرابة الدم أو صداقة ولا تكفيه شهادة "شيخ جامع" بل يحتاج إلى شهادات اختصاص عليا متميزة  وخبرة مثبتة وإلمام بعلم الإدارة الحديثة بما في ذلك إدارة البرامج والمشاريع الكبرى  بالإضافة طبعا إلى شروط  النزاهة و نكران الذات وفي ذلك فليتنافس التنافسون....  

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Obama's UN remarks on the new Libya

Good morning. Mr. Secretary-General, on behalf of us all, thank you for
convening this meeting to address a task that must be the work of us
all-supporting the people of Libya as they build a future that is free,
democratic and prosperous. And I want to thank Chairman Jalil for his
remarks and for all that he and Prime Minister Jibril have done to help
Libya reach this moment.



Today, the Libyan people are writing a new chapter in the life of their
nation. After four decades of darkness, they can walk the streets, free
from a tyrant. They’re making their voices heard-in new newspapers, on
radio and television; in public squares and on personal blogs. They’re
launching political parties and civil society groups to shape their own
destiny and secure their universal rights. And here at the United
Nations, the new flag of a free Libya now flies among the community of
nations.



Make no mistake, credit for the liberation of Libya belongs to the
people of Libya. It was Libyan men, women-and children-who took to the
streets in peaceful protest, faced down the tanks and endured the
snipers’ bullets. It was Libyan fighters, often outgunned and
outnumbered, who fought pitched battles, town by town, block by block.
It was Libyan activists-in the underground, in chat rooms and
mosques-who kept a revolution alive, even after some in the world gave
up hope.



It was Libyan women and girls who hung flags and smuggled weapons to the
front. It was Libyans from countries around the world, including my
own, who rushed home to help, even though they too risked brutality and
death. It was Libyan blood that was spilled and Libya’s sons and
daughters who gave their lives. And on that August day-after all that
sacrifice, after 42 long years-it was Libyans who pushed their dictator
from power.



At the same time, Libya is a lesson in what the international community
can achieve when we stand together as one. We cannot and should not
intervene every time there’s an injustice in the world. Yet it’s also
true that at times the world could have and should have summoned the
will to prevent the killing of innocents on a horrific scale. And we
are forever haunted by the atrocities we did not prevent, the lives we
did not save. But this time was different. This time, we found the
courage and the collective will to act.



When the old regime unleashed a campaign of terror, threatening to roll
back the democratic tide sweeping the region, we acted-as united
nations-and we acted swiftly; broadening sanctions; imposing an arms
embargo. The United States led the effort to pass an historic
resolution at the Security Council authorizing “all necessary measures”
to protect the Libyan people. And when the civilians of Benghazi were
threatened with a massacre, we exercised that authority. Our
international coalition stopped the regime in its tracks, saved
countless lives, and gave the Libyan people the time and space to
prevail.



Important, too, is how this effort succeeded-thanks to the leadership
and contributions of many nations. The United States was proud to play
a decisive role, especially in the first days, and, then, in a
supporting capacity. But let us also remember that it was the Arab
League that appealed for action. It was the world’s most effective
alliance, NATO, that’s led a military coalition of nearly 20 nations.
It’s our European allies-especially the United Kingdom, France, Denmark
and Norway-that conducted the vast majority of airstrikes. It was Arab
states who joined the coalition, as equal partners. And it’s been the
United Nations and neighboring countries, including Tunisia and Egypt,
that have cared for Libyans in the urgent humanitarian effort that
continues today.



This is how the international community should work in the 21st
century-more nations bearing the responsibility and costs of meeting
global challenges. Indeed, it is the very purpose of this United
Nations. So every nation represented here today can take pride in the
innocent lives we saved and in helping Libyans reclaim their country.
It was the right thing to do.



Now, even as we speak, remnants of the old regime continue to fight.
Difficult days are still ahead. But one thing is clear-the future of
Libya is now in the hands of its people. For just as it was Libyans who
tore down the old order, it will be Libyans who build their new nation.
And we have come here today to say to the people of Libya-just as the
world stood by you in your struggle to be free, we will stand with you
in your struggle to realize the peace and prosperity that freedom can
bring.



In this effort, you will have a friend and partner in the United States
of America. Today, I can announce that our ambassador is on his way
back to Tripoli. And this week, the American flag that was lowered
before our embassy was attacked will be raised again, over a re-opened
American embassy. We’ll work closely with the new U.N. Support Mission
in Libya and with the nations here today to assist the Libyan people in
the hard work ahead.



First, and most immediately, security. So long as the Libyan people are
being threatened, the NATO-led mission to protect them will continue.
And those still holding out must understand-the old regime is over, and
it is time to lay down your arms and join the new Libya. As this
happens, the world must support efforts to secure dangerous
weapons-conventional and otherwise-and bring fighters under central,
civilian control. For without security, democracy, trade, and
investment cannot flourish.



Second, the humanitarian effort. The Transitional National Council has
been working quickly to restore water and electricity and the food
supply to Tripoli. But for many Libyans, each day is still a
struggle-to recover from their wounds, reunite with their families, and
return to their homes. And even after the guns of war fall silent, the
ravages of war will linger. So too must the effort to assist its
victims. In this, the United Nations will play a key role. And along
with our partners, the United States will do our part to help the hungry
and the wounded.



Third, a democratic transition that is peaceful, inclusive and just.
Chairman Jalil has reaffirmed the Transitional Council’s commitment to
these principles, and the United Nations will play a central role in
coordinating international support for this effort. We all know what’s
needed. A transition that is timely. New laws and a constitution that
uphold the rule of law. Political parties and a strong civil society.
And, for the first time in Libyan history, free and fair elections.




True democracy, however, must flow from citizens. As Libyans rightly
seek justice for past crimes, let it be done in a spirit of
reconciliation, not reprisals and violence. As Libyans draw strength
from their faith-a religion rooted in peace and tolerance-let there be a
rejection of violent extremism, which offers nothing but death and
destruction. As Libyans rebuild, let those efforts tap the experience
of all those with the skills to contribute, including the many Africans
in Libya. And as Libyans forge a society that is truly just, let it
enshrine the rights and role of women at all levels of society. For we
know that nations that uphold the human rights of all their
people-especially their women-are ultimately more successful and more
prosperous.



Which brings me to the final area where the world must stand with
Libya-restoring prosperity. For too long, Libya’s vast riches were
stolen and squandered. Now, that wealth must serve its rightful
owners-the Libyan people. As sanctions are lifted, as the United States
and the international community unfreeze more Libyan assets, and as the
country’s oil production is restored, the Libyan people deserve a
government that is transparent and accountable. And bound by the Libyan
students and entrepreneurs who have forged friendships in America, the
United States will build new partnerships to help unleash Libya’s
extraordinary potential.



None of this will be easy. After decades of iron rule by one man, it
will take time to build the institutions needed for a democratic Libya.
There will be days of frustration; when progress is slow; when some
begin to wish for the old order and its illusion of stability. And some
in the world may ask-can Libya succeed? But if we have learned anything
these many months, it is this-do not underestimate the aspirations and
will of the Libyan people.



So I want to conclude by speaking directly to the people of Libya. Your
task may be new; the journey ahead may be fraught. But everything you
need to build the future you seek already beats in the heart of your
nation. It’s the same raw courage you summoned on that first February
day. The same steely resilience that brought you back out the next day
and the next, even as you lost family and friends. The same unshakeable
determination with which you liberated Benghazi, broke the siege of
Misrata and have fought through the coastal plains and the western
mountains. It’s the same unwavering conviction that said-there’s no
turning back; our sons and daughters deserve to be free.



In the days after Tripoli fell, people rejoiced in the streets and
pondered the road ahead. And one of those Libyans said, “We have this
chance now to do something good for our country, a chance we have
dreamed of for so long.” To the people of Libya-this is your chance.
And today the world is saying, in one unmistakable voice-we will stand
with you as you seize this moment of promise; as you reach for the
freedom, the dignity and the opportunity you deserve.



Thank you all very much.

Monday, September 12, 2011

خيارات ليبيا الجديدة

  •  دولة يعلو فيها القانون  وقيم الحرية والعدالة والتسامح وأخرى تنزلق بنا إلى مستنقع الفوضى من جديد...
  • دولة مدنية  حديثة تضمن التداول  السلمي على الحكم و  فصل السلطات  وأخرى تحكمها لغة  العسكر والسلاح... 
  • دولة تشترط المؤهلات والتخصص  والنزاهة في حكومتها  وأخرى يتكالب على حكمها  انتهازيون و أشباه متعلمين....
  • دولة تخدم فيها الحكومة شعبها ويراقبها ويسائلها وأخرى يخدم فيها الشعب حكومته وتراقبه وتسائله...
  • دولة تسمو فوق التعصب الديني والقبلي والعرقي وأخرى تنزلق بنا إلى مستنقع التعصب  والجاهلية والقبلية...
  • دولة تسعى إلى تنويع اقتصادها والخروج به من  لعنة النفط وتتعلم من تجارب الآخرين وأخرى لا تفقه في الأمر شيئا 
  • دولة تقدس دور المرأة ونعتبرها شريكا أساسيا للرجل وأخرى تنظر إليها نظرة متخلفة و تحقرها وتحجم دورها...
  • دولة تعي أهمية الشباب ودورهم في بناء المستقبل وتضمن لهم فرص التعليم والتدريب والعمل وأخرى لا تكترث بذلك ...
  • دولة  ترعى العلوم والثقافة والإبداع  وأخرى تجهل كل ذلك ...
  • دولة تحارب الفقر والجهل و الفساد والمكتبية  وأخرى تنميها...

أحداث "حاوية الخمس" تؤكد بشاعة كتلئب القذافي


CNN Ben Wedeman on Saadi's escape to Niger


Ethics displayed by Misrata brigade commander


Sunday, August 21, 2011

Gaddafi TV presenter holding a gun as FF prepare to storm Tripoli

At gun point, they are forcing him to repeat the new Gaddafi SS slogan:"God, Muammar, Libya and no more!

Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Gaddafi thugs torturing a Libyan freedom fighter in Zliten

At gun point, they are forcing him to repeat the new Gaddafi SS slogan:"God, Muammar, Libya and no more!

Friday, July 22, 2011

ما أشبه اليوم بالأمس في ليبيا








في مثل هذا الشهر منذ سبعين عاما كانت ليبيا ترزح تماما مثلما ترزح اليوم  تحت وطأة ساسلة من أشرس الحملات العسكرية التي شهدتها الحرب العالمية الثانية والتي جرت آنذاك بين كتائب االمحور من جهة وكتائب الحلفاء  من جهة أخرى وكانت أنظار العالم آنذاك مشدودة مثلما هي اليوم نحو أطراف الصحراء الليبية  الشاسعة حيث معارك الكر والفر والألغام والموت.
وما أن انتهت الحرب بانتصارالحلفاء حتى شعروا بالأهمية الإستراجية لليبيا فتسابقوا إليها تماما كما يتسابقون اليوم حيت استحوذت بريطانيا على منطقة برقة في الشرق وطرابلس في الغرب وبسطت قوات "فرنسا الحرة" نفوذها على منطقة فزان في الجنوب... ورغم أن ملامح الثروة النفطية لم تكن قد تأكدت بعد في ذلك الوقت و كانت ليبيا لا زالت تعد من أفقر مناطق العالم إلا أن أهمية موقعها سرعان ما دعت كلا من بريطانيا والولايات المتحدة إلى التحالف لضمها تحت الحماية مخيبة آمال دول كانت هي الأخرى لها أطماعها مثل روسيا وفرنسا وألمانيا وإيطاليا تماما كما هو الحال اليوم.
وها نحن نرى هذه الدول الكبرى ذاتها تعود لنفس الأدوار القديمة في ليبيا بعد أن نجح في استدراجها دكتاتور مجرم يستميت بكرسي الحكم في بلد أمعن في نهبه وتخريبه وتجهيله على مدى أربعة عقود... وقد استدرجها هذه المرة بقمعه ووعيده لشعبه واستدرجها بدهائه وعمالته حتى يخلط الأوراق ويحول الأنظار عن حكمه الفاسد... ويعلق آثار فشله وتخريبه لليبيا على مدى العقود الماضية... يعلق كل ذلك على التدخل الخارجي... و ها نحن نرى نفس هذه الدول بحثا عن مصالحها من جديد... تتبنى مشروع إنقاذ ليبيا من براثن مجرم كانت هي ذاتها قد ساهمت في دعمه وتسليحه بالأمس... ونراها اليوم توحي بأنها تسند الثوار لكنها تمنع عنهم اموالهم وتشح عليهم بالعون وتتباطىء في كسر العتاد الثقيل الذي يهددهم بدعوى أنها ليست على يقين من هويتهم...
وها نحن نرى هذا المجرم في الوقت الذي ينكل  فيه بشعبه ويتظاهر بتوعد القوى العظمى في العلن فهو يستجدي نفس هذه القوى في الخفاء... واعدا إياها بأن يكون خير عميل لها... ويعدها كل ما تشاء كي تخفف الضغط عنه أملا في الإحتفاظ بكرسي الحكم... ونراه أيضا يذكي نار القبلية ويوظفها لأغراضه... ويوهم المحرومين والعاطلين والبسطاء من الليبيين الذين  أجرم في تجهيلهم و سلب حياتهم من قبل... يوهمهم هذا الدجال  بأموال ووظائف وجنة لم يروها من قبل طيلة حكمه الثقيل... محرضا إياهم  يوما بعد يوم أن يموتوا من أجل أن يعيش هو وأولاده... ونرى من هنا وهناك في الداخل والخارج  من يهلل له ويصفق له... ومن يداري عن الشمس جرائمه الصارخة...ومن يمد له طوق النجاة...ولكننا نرى أيضا يوما بعد يوم ليبيين شرفاء يضحون بأرواحهم من أجل إسقاط هذا النظام الفاسد برمته وكافة رموزه...يرابطون بما أوتوا من عتاد زهيد كما رابط أجدادهم بالأمس وهم يصرخون "ليبيا تنزف...ليبيا تعاني...ليبيا تموت...يا الله...يا الله..."

Thursday, July 7, 2011

هل يعول على سماسرة القذافي في قيادة ليبيا الجديدة؟


لا شك أن الأستاذ  مصطفى عبد الجليل رئيس المجلس الوطني الإنتقالي في ليبيا  شخص يتمتع  بالإحترام والتقدير لجهوده ومواقفه في هذه المرحلة الحساسة للثورة الليبية وهو مشهود له بحسه الوطني وطيبته  لكن تصريحاته  الأخيرة والمتضاربة حول  كيفية التعامل مع  القذافي بعد سقوطه و إمكانية قبول المجلس المبدئي بإعفائه من المحاكمة  أثارت نوعا من القلق حير الكثيرين خاصة  أن هذا التصريح قد جاء  في أعقاب صدور بيان الإتهام للقذافي وأعوانه من قبل المحكمة الجنائية الدولية ورغم تراجع السيد عبد الجليل عن  هذا الموقف في ما بعد  إلا أن الأمر قد عكس لدى متتبعي الشأن الليبي نمطا من التخبط و التناقض وعدم وضوح الرؤية في مواقف المجلس.

 وبالأمس خاطب رئيس المجلس الأهالي في بنغازي  وأنهى خطابه  بنصائح إرشادبة خمس على سياق ما تحمله خطب الجمعة و لإن كان بعضها كالعناق  يعبر عن رأيه الشخصي فقط و لا يمت بصلة للقضية الليبية المطروحة إلا أن نقطته الأولى أثارت اهتمامي لكونها ذات علاقة مباشرة  بمستقبل ليبيا السياسي فقد دعى السيد عبد الجليل إلى عدم إقصاء المسؤولين السابقين الذين خدموا أو ما زالوا يخدمون نظام القذافي من مناصبهم  في ليبيا الجديدة و الذي يبعث على مزيد من القلق هو تزامن هذا التصريح للسيد عبد الجليل مع تصريحات غربية أخرى مشابهة .

والمتتبع للشأن العراقي يعي جيدا الجدل القائم حول أسباب الفشل الذي أعقب الغزو الأمريكي للعراق والإطاحة بنظام صدام حسين حيث أوعز البعض أن حل أجهزة البعث والأجهزة الأمنية كان سببا رئيسيا لهذا الفشل حيث  أنه أحدث فراغا و نقمة في الشارع العراقي  لكن هناك من يقول أيضا أن العوامل الأهم من ذلك تكمن في شيئين أولهما تكالب عناصر انتهازية فاسدة  على الحكم في أعقاب سقوط صدام واستباقها إلى تقاسم السلطة وتغييب الشارغ العراقي  وثانيهما استمرار  النفوذ الأجنبي  الذي قد لا تتفق مصالحه بالضرورة دائما مع المصالح الوطنية العراقية وكلا الأمرين وارد في الحالة الليبية أيضا.

 ولإن كنت أتفق مع الأستاذ عبد الجليل بأنه قد يكون من الحكمة ألاندعو إلى إقصاء  أعوان  القذافي ممن لم يشاركوا في إيذاء الليبيين  خلال حكمه إلا أن هؤلاء للأسف قلة  و لا يعني هذا أن نفتح المجال  لجميع أولائك الذين اختارهم القذافي  لولائهم  دون أي اعتبار للكفاءة و قد كانت هذه كما نعلم سياسة منهجية لنظامه وعرف أعوانه في غالبيتهم  بالنفاق والفساد ونهب المال العام  ناهيك عن الفشل  الإداري فهل نؤمن هولاء مسؤوليات قيادية في ليبيا ما بعد القذافي وإذا حصل هذا لا قدر الله  فالعواقب لا شك ستكون وخيمة وستذهب تضحيات الليبيين وشهدائهم هباءا.

 ويبقى السؤال المهم الذي  ظل و ربما سيظل يطرح نفسه  بعد رحيل  القذافي هو شكل الدولة الجديدة التي يصبو إليها الليبيون والليبيات... سؤال  يخص الليبيين  والليبيات قبل غيرهم و لا بد من عدم التأخير في الخوض فيه ولا بد أن يوضع على رأس جدول أعمال مؤتمر وطني موسع ومفتوح للجميع مباشرة بعد التحرير  والإجابة على هذا السؤال أمر لا شك  أنه يحتاج إلى قدر  كبير من الوعي وبعد النظر ونكران الذات...

 واختيار الإجابة  سيحدد مصير ليبيا  وهي على مفترق طريقين أحدهما يأخذنا إلى بلد يسود فيه الدستور والحداثة  والعلم وتنمو فيه قيم الحرية والكرامة والعدالة وآخر ينزلق بنا إلى مستنقع الدكتاتورية والتخلف من جديد حتى وإن كان ذلك في غلاف جديد:
  • دولة المجتمع المدني  الحديثة أم آخرى  تجرنا إلى الوراء و تكرس الجهل ...
  • دولة تشترط المؤهلات والتخصص  والنزاهة في حكومتها  وأخرى يتكالب على حكمها  انتهازيون و أنصاف متعلمين....
  • دولة تخدم فيها الحكومة شعبها ويراقبها ويسائلها وأخرى يخدم فيها الشعب حكومته وتراقبه وتسائله...
  • دولة تضمن التداول  السلمي على الحكم و  فصل السلطات وحيادية الجيش وأخرى تؤول فيها السلطة للعسكر من جديد...
  • دولة تسمو فوق التعصب الديني والقبلي والعرقي وأخرى تنزلق بنا إلى مستنقع التعصب والجاهلية والقبلية...
  • دولة تسعى إلى تنويع اقتصادنا والخروج به من ضائقة الإعتماد على لعنة النفط وتتعلم من تجارب الآخرين وأخرى لا تفقه في هذا الأمر شيئا ...
  • دولة تعي دور المرأة ونعتبرها شريكا أساسيا للرجل وأخرى تنظر إليها نظرة متخلفة و تحقرها وتحجم دورها...
  • دولة تعي أهمية الشباب ودورهم في بناء المستقبل وتضمن لهم فرص التعليم والتدريب والعمل وأخرى لاتكترث بهم ...
  • دولة  ترعى العلوم والثقافة والإبداع  وأخرى تجهل كل ذلك ...
  • دولة تحارب الفقر والجهل و الفساد والمكتبية  وأخرى تنميها...

فهل ينتصر الوعي وبعد النظر ونكران الذات  يا ترى أم ينتصر الجهل وقصر النظر وحب الذات...إن غدا لناظره لقريب...

النصائح الخمس لمصطفى عبد الجليل


Wednesday, June 29, 2011

An early Gaddafi victim: Dr Amr Al- Nami: Scholar, poet & Cambridge graduate

Dr Amr Al- Nami, scholar, poet and Cambridge graduate, was born in Nalut of the Western Libyan mountains and came to be an early victim of Gaddafi's terror.  Soon after his return home from Cambridge in the early 70's,  he was imprisoned by Gaddafi for his beliefs, strong independent personality and popularity among his students. Later, forced to leave the country, he moved with his family to the US  where he taught  at the University of Michigan and later to Japan. Upon his return home again, he continued to be persecuted by the regime. He gave up teaching  and retreated to the Western mountains choosing a simple life herding sheep but was arrested again in 1981 and has since disappeared. He reportedly died under torture while in prison and his family knew nothing about his whereabouts. Dr Al-Nami will be remembered as a Libyan icon and a humanist. He chose to pay with his life rather than compromise his principles and bow to a dictator. May his soul rest in peace!

The following three verses are a near translation from a touching poem in Arabic,  written by the martyr in his prison cell back in 1974 and addressed to his mother:

Mother... don't you worry now... don't show them you're sad!
How about a smile now... I hate to see you weak...I hate to see you feeling bad! 

Mother don't show them they're winning... Mother don't show them you're aching

You see, we have towered high above the tyrants. Mother, we're men but they're not!

أماه لا تجزعي بل وابسمي فرحا      فحزن قلبك ضغف لست أرضاه
أماه لا تشعريهم أنهم غلبوا             أماه لا تسمعيهم منك أواه
إنا شمخنا على الطاغوت في شمم        نحن الرجال وهم يا أم أشباه


Tuesday, June 14, 2011

Gaddafi-Inc: About millions, billions & more

Listening to his own account claiming to live on a modest monthly salary of  US$ 400, you would think Gaddafi should be eligible for social security. Never mind that this sum is nowhere nearly enough to cover the cost of his collection of sunglasses and flamboyant robes. Those who believe the Libyan dictator should of course have no problem believing that he also has no official position in Libya and that despite his constant shelling of their cities and towns, all Libyans in fact still  love him. After all,  it is an old saying that love hurts.

By many other accounts, it is a different story and Gaddafi may be worth as much as a $100 billion, if not more. While in the aftermath of the Libyan uprising chunks of this money have been frozen around the world, this may be only the tip of an iceberg. Not counting liquidity and other assets inside Libya itself, $70 billions have been reportedly invested in sovereign wealth funds abroad, under the umbrella of a shady Libyan Investment Authority run by the Gaddafi family and its insiders. In a country where accountability is practically non-existent, many Libyans have been left wondering about where their oil money was going and why they were being kept in the dark about it. Meanwhile, in the country they live in, the infrastructure is in shambles, unemployment, poverty and corruption are rampant and terror rules. Despite its mineral riches and small population count, Gaddafi's Libya suffers from a chronic shortage of housing, lack of basic services and a dire state of both the education and health systems. On a few occasions, sensing their anger, Gaddafi appeased his fellow Libyans with false promises that they would soon get their share of the wealth but then of course failed to deliver. On other occasions, he assured them that he was taking care of their money for them so that they would not waste it away on “silly things such as chewing gum and chocolate”. Most of the time however, he just bluntly told them that oil was simply not theirs and that they should fend off for themselves and perhaps think of emigrating instead to Africa or Europe  since “Libya holds no future for them”.

While most of the Libyans have been suffering in silence, the Gaddafi family has been busy investing and buying assets and luxury property across the globe. In the aftermath of the Lockerbie bombing, Gaddafi used billions of dollars of Libya's money to bail out his regime. Billions more were spent to gain political influence in Africa and elsewhere. Millions were spent on polishing his image in the West and millions more on New Year’s parties thrown by his sons, in exotic places such as St Bart’s in the Caribbean. The likes of Beyoncé, Nelly Furtado and Mariah Carey were paid a million dollar each just to entertain the Gaddafi Juniors here and there, sometimes for less than an hour. There were of course times when bills were not paid by one son or another, for one reason or another. In 2006, during a visit to Sydney, Australia, one of the sons reportedly left the country without paying a $7000 bill at a Sydney brothel and in 2010, Saadi failed to pay a half-million dollar hotel bill in Italy, which led to a court order and an additional fee of 5,000 Euros to be paid on top.

Speaking of money, when he first grabbed power in Libya, Gaddafi had a hard time figuring out how many zeros were in a million, but he was shrewd enough to know how to use the money for maintaining power. In time, he came to know about billions and eventually even trillions. During his infamous 2009 speech at the UN General Assembly, the Libyan dictator said Africa deserves compensation from its past colonizers, a noble idea in itself. After first suggesting a figure of  $7.7 trillion, he hesitated for a few seconds and then changed the amount to $777 trillion. Magic numbers aside, one is left wondering as to how the self-crowned King of Kings came up with this figure, knowing that this year’s size of the whole global economy is less than $70 Trillion. Luckily, the translator stuck with the smaller figure.

Sunday, June 12, 2011

A disturbing pattern of savagery shown by Gaddafi troops

In this video, which speaks for itself even without translation, the prisoners, apparently from the Western "Nafusa" Mountains, are shown to be subjected to harsh abuse, both physical and verbal, and are forced to declare allegiance to Gaddafi. At one point (~3':47), one of the Gaddafi troops suggests to kill them while another pleads with his group to wait and not finish them off with their boots, as "they might still have some useful information to give". "They will be executed anyway", he added!




Wednesday, June 1, 2011

ليبيا ما بعد القذافي وخيارات الليبيين

يمكن القول أنه  ثمة شبه إجماع لدى كافة الليبيين والليبيات على أن سقوط  الحكم الفاسد في ليبيا  والذي عاث في الأرض فسادا وطغى وتجبر على مدى أكثر من أربعة عقود قد بات وشيكا و اقتربت ساعته.

 لكن السؤال المهم الذي  يظل يطرح نفسه  بعد رحيل  النظام  هو شكل الدولة الجديدة التي يصبو إليها الليبيون والليبيات... سؤال لا بد من الخوض فيه منذ الآن في إطار موسع على كافة المستويات الإعلامية والوطنية والشبابية  ولا بد أن يوضع على رأس جدول أعمال المؤتمر الوطني المزمع عقده  بعد التحرير  وهو أمر لا شك سوف  يحتاج إلى قدر  كبير من الوعي وبعد النظر ونكران الذات وسيضعنا أمام خيارين: 
  •  دولة يعلو فيها القانون  وقيم الحرية والعدالة والتسامح وأخرى تنزلق بنا إلى مستنقع الفوضى من جديد...
  • دولة مدنية  حديثة تضمن التداول  السلمي على الحكم و  فصل السلطات  وأخرى تحكمها لغة  العسكر والسلاح... 
  • دولة تشترط المؤهلات والتخصص  والنزاهة في حكومتها  وأخرى يتكالب على حكمها  انتهازيون و أشباه متعلمين....
  • دولة تخدم فيها الحكومة شعبها ويراقبها ويسائلها وأخرى يخدم فيها الشعب حكومته وتراقبه وتسائله...
  • دولة تسمو فوق التعصب الديني والقبلي والعرقي وأخرى تنزلق بنا إلى مستنقع التعصب  والجاهلية والقبلية...
  • دولة تسعى إلى تنويع اقتصادها والخروج به من  لعنة النفط وتتعلم من تجارب الآخرين وأخرى لا تفقه في الأمر شيئا 
  • دولة تقدس دور المرأة ونعتبرها شريكا أساسيا للرجل وأخرى تنظر إليها نظرة متخلفة و تحقرها وتحجم دورها...
  • دولة تعي أهمية الشباب ودورهم في بناء المستقبل وتضمن لهم فرص التعليم والتدريب والعمل وأخرى لا تكترث بذلك ...
  • دولة  ترعى العلوم والثقافة والإبداع  وأخرى تجهل كل ذلك ...
  • دولة تحارب الفقر والجهل و الفساد والمكتبية  وأخرى تنميها...

فيا ترى هل ينتصر الوعي و بعد النظر و نكران الذات...   أم ينتصر الجهل و قصر النظر و حب الذات...إن غدا لناظره لقريب...




Sunday, May 29, 2011

Once a self-declared “King of Kings”, Gaddafi is now reportedly ready for a more modest title







As Mr Zuma reflects on the empty promises by Gaddafi of a ceasefire he never honored and elections he always mocked, he should be reminded of what had happened to his compatriot, the late Anton Hammerl. For weeks, Gaddafi had assured the South African president that Mr Hammerl, a photojournalist who had come to cover the Battle for Libya, was alive and well. It later turned out that he had been cold-bloodedly shot by pro-Gaddafi militias and left to die in the desert.

Strange as it may sound, Gaddafi, who lately has been under serious investigation by the International Criminal Court for war crimes in Libya, is quoted ready to extend amnesty to his victims. He has even gone to the extent of promising his people a constitution, albeit only half-heartedly. In a speech delivered this past March to celebrate his day of “People’s Authority”, Gaddafi declared for the first time in 42 years that yes, they can have a constitution. “It is not a big deal”, he added. Sensing that winds have now changed, the beleaguered leader has been sending out a series of balloon statements, initially through his sons and more recently through his prime minister. The statements suggest that the once self-declared absolute “King of Kings” may now be ready to settle for a more modest figurehead title, like the Queen of England or even the Emperor of Japan. Gaddafi’s motives are of course deceivingly simple, relieve the mounting international pressure, ride out the current wave and wait for another day to reassert his grip on power and keep it in the family.

Most Libyans will tell you they were repeatedly exposed to false promises by Gaddafi in the past, so they are unlikely to be won by a sudden and wolfish change of heart. For well over four decades of heavy-handed rule, Gaddafi has used every trick under his hat to keep power. He has built a regime feeding on terror, corruption and tribalism. Early on in his rule, he dismissed the ideas of elections and representative government, abolished the constitution and ruthlessly crushed all forms of opposition and civil society. In its place, he invented an Orwellian police state and a unique political system he coined “Jamahiriya”, which literally means “State of the Masses”. On the surface, Gaddafi is quick to assure you that he holds no official position in this Jamahiriya, which he calls paradise and that the government of the people is run by the people themselves. In reality however, it has been anything but that. Most Libyans will tell you that Gaddafi has designed this system so that he alone can call the shots. Early on in his rule and in a bid to consolidate power, Gaddafi also moved to destroy the national army, considered a potential threat to his rule. In its place, he formed family-run private militias overseen by some of his own sons. It is these militias, supported by a network of Gestapo-style revolutionary committees and foreign mercenaries that he now finds handy to terrorize whole cities and towns across Libya. The bill of course is being paid for by the victims themselves. 

For many years, most Libyans have lived in poverty and have watched their oil-rich country fall into decadence and sheer neglect while sons of the Beloved Leader were throwing millions of dollars on New Year’s parties at exotic Caribbean clubs and elsewhere.  Faced with mounting dissent at home, Gaddafi gave repeated promises to distribute oil revenues directly to the Libyan people, only to go back on his words. As dissent turned to jokes about government lies and corruption, he invented a program of mock wealth distribution, which amounted to no more than selective meager handouts, tied to loyalty to his regime.


While Libyans have been suffering for many years in silence under Gaddafi, recent unrest in Libya and the gruesome acts of the regime finally drew attention of the rest of the world. Gaddafi answered his fellow citizens call for freedom by unleashing a ruthless terror campaign against them, using his powerful arsenal of heavy weapons. Entire cities and towns were surrounded and indiscriminately shelled. Daily war crimes have been and continue to be committed by his militias and mercenaries, including acts of cold-blooded murder, rape and the use of cluster bombs and mines against innocent civilians. In a strategy of collective punishment, electricity, water and communication lines have been cut, water wells poisoned and looting encouraged.  When Misrata proved difficult to subdue and pushed back  his militias despite their superior arms and despite the sustained barrage of heavy shelling over many weeks, Gaddafi played his last and favorite card,  tribalism.  In a taped audio message, he incited the neighboring town of Ben Waleed to attack  Misrata on his behalf but failed in his attempt. Ben Walid has chosen to side with Misrata  and the revolution.

These days, a quick scan of Gaddafi’s daily media reveals an isolated and bankrupt regime in total disarray. To rally support for his crumbling regime, Gaddafi is finding himself appealing to a ragtag herd of semi-literate Imams and tribal elders. As notorious for committing crimes and then blaming others for them as he is known to be, Gaddafi is denying responsibility for any wrongdoing. Interestingly, as atrocities multiplied and the sheer size of destruction and human suffering has become impossible to deny,  the regime is now starting to acknowledge, even if still only whispering, that “yes, gross mistakes may have been committed in Misrata and elsewhere, but it is the other side who is to blame. Our Beloved Leader could have never ordered such atrocities”. Just in case the International Criminal Court rules otherwise, Gaddafi and his close circle of accomplices should of course face justice, for only when justice is served can the wounds of Libya finally heal.

Friday, May 27, 2011

The new Libya I dream of calls for more toll, sweat & wisdom


While the rest of the Arab World is also facing dictators and fighting for change, it is probably safe to say that Gaddafi represents the worst of the bunch. Not only has he been a model for ruthlessness and excessive terror, but he also suffers from a large dose of megalomania and self-worship. Worse still, in his bid to cling to power, he has dedicated his long and heavy-handed rule to establishing a system feeding on terror, corruption, poverty and tribalism.

Early on in his dictatorial rule, Gaddafi adopted a strategy of mass terror, as an effective instrument to secure his grip on power. Students and activists alike were persecuted and public hangings of regime opponents were orchestrated and televised on numerous occasions to promote a climate of fear across Libya. Civil society in all its forms was always discouraged and the forming of political parties, NGOs and trade unions was banned.

Promoting corruption went hand in hand with promoting fear to serve the regime. Loyalty replaced competence as a prerequisite for high-level government jobs, favors and scholarships. Education was systematically destroyed to promote ignorance. Early on in his rule, Gaddafi understood that the overly-simplistic political and voodoo economic thoughts laid down in his tiny Green Book would appear more convincing to an illiterate or semi-literate youth than to someone with a good education. English as a foreign language was dropped from school curricula for many years and books were banned.

Fueling corruption was an economy solely based on the oil curse, which was grossly abused by the regime. A strategy of buying loyalty for cash was put in place. Vast sums were vainly spent on grand schemes and failing military and political ambitions. The rest was diverted to personal gain benefiting the regime and those who supported it. There was absolutely no accountability and no government oversight. Worse, there was neither the capacity nor the interest on the part of Gaddafi to modernize the economy and diversify it away from its vulnerable commodity-base state, which persists to this day. As a result, unemployment has skyrocketed, the infrastructure is in shambles and poverty is strikingly prevalent in the oil-rich country.

For Gaddafi, tribalism also went hand in hand as a useful tool, conveniently used to divide and rule. Even as people were striving to rise above old tribal lines and aspiring to build a modern civil society, Gaddafi was working hard to recreate old and when necessary invent new tribal divisions.

Once Gaddafi disappears from the scene, the New Libya will have to undo all negative ills entrenched by the dictator and embark on the difficult task of rebuilding whatever he had destroyed. The new Libya I dream of is one where fear is replaced by freedom and respect for basic rights, where all citizens feel their country belongs to them and where justice is balanced with national reconciliation. The Libya I dream of is a modern, civil and secular state, where religious freedom and freedom of expression are cherished concepts and racism is not tolerated. The Libya I dream of is one which elects its government based on competence and integrity rather than tribalism and cronyism, a government with a credible program to eradicate poverty, stamp out corruption and reduce bureaucracy, a government able to diversify our economy away from the oil curse and assure a fair distribution of wealth, a government which is held accountable and can be dismissed by the people when it does not deliver. The new Libya would be one where separation of powers, transparency, equal opportunities and a neutral military are assured. The new Libya would be one, which aligns itself with the young revolutions of the Arab World, integrates its development programs with theirs and learns from the experience of the rest of the world. The new Libya I dream of is a country where good education, science and technology, vocational training, youth programs and gender equality are valued and taken seriously and where self-expression, creativity, diversity and culture are cherished.

In his first speech after becoming war prime minister, Winston Churchill said that he had “nothing to offer but blood, toll, tears and sweat”. By all accounts, this was a bold statement by a visionary, which came in the darkest hour of Britain when Europe and other parts of the world were facing a ferocious war campaign by Hitler and his allies. Seventy years later, Libya is finding itself in a similar situation. Its own dictator, in a bid for power and personal glory, has unleashed his military machinery, paid for by the Libyan people, to crush their genuine aspirations for freedom and democracy. The immediate goal for the Libyan revolution is of course to achieve victory against this tyrant, serve justice and heal the country. Granted, this is still work in progress and in itself a difficult and daunting task. It has cost Libyan blood and suffering and engaged concerted international efforts that Libyans gracefully acknowledge. However, defeating the dictator and uprooting his rotten regime will only be a partial victory. Building a New Libya from the ruins of the old one is an even more difficult and daunting task, but nevertheless essential to achieve full victory. This will call not only for more toll, tears and sweat but also for a demonstration of unity and wisdom by no other than the Libyans themselves.

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Gaddafi's Ministry of Truth

In his reaction to a recent NATO bombing, Moussa Ibrahim, Gaddafi’s cousin and as of now "Minister of Truth”,  said that one of the buildings hit was an anti-corruption office where files implicating members of the newly formed Transitional National Council,  were being kept.  Thanks to him, we now know why Libya was always rated at the bottom of the corruption index by Transparency International.

The ministry of Truth is of course not a Gaddafi invention. Before him, “Big Brother”, the famous George Orwell character in “1984”, knew of its virtues and methodically practiced it. However, it may be so that Gaddafi is now raising it to new dimensions. As the rebellion swept Libya and the regime struggled to contain it, Gaddafi kept assuring the world that all Libyans loved him and that he was only facing a handful of Al-Qaeda elements aided by drugged and hallucinated kids. Many in the Arab World joked that their people may need some of those hallucination drugs that Gaddafi was talking about.  Addressing Libyans in one of his recent ramblings about prospects for him leaving office, Gaddafi reiterated his standard reply that he has not held any office in Libya since 1977 and that if he did, he would have thrown his resignation in their faces.  Before finishing his speech however, he threatened to crush all opposition “rats” challenging his rule, alley by alley or “Zanga-Zanga”, as he famously put it.

There was also the episode of an earlier NATO bombing of one of Gaddafi’s command and control centers in Tripoli. Again, according to the ministry of truth, one of his sons, Saif Al-Arab and three grandchildren were presumably killed.  Now, Saif Al-Arab is a shady character and not a lot is known about him. This much we know about him from Spiegel. In 2006, he was living in Munich and reportedly scuffled with a night club bouncer for forcibly removing his girlfriend who was stripping on the dance floor. Despite the orchestrated funeral, many Libyans refuse to buy the story, discrediting it as simply a ploy by Gaddafi to misinform and attract sympathy from his followers.   In the aftermath of the raid ordered by Reagan on his headquarters in Tripoli in 1986, Gaddafi had thrown out a similar story about an adopted daughter, claiming she was killed. Even then, many people did not believe it.

As NATO intensified its air campaign against his heavy armor, Gaddafi resorted to a new tactic, using troops in civilian cars, pickup trucks and buses.  In order to camouflage his military moves, his ministry of truth started drumming up stories about busloads of tribal leaders and imams, allegedly on “peace missions” to cities and towns out of government control.  Not long before, the regime  was threatening to annihilate these very cities, in particular Benghazi and Misrata for daring to fight for freedom. As his command and control capacity took a severe blow by NATO, Gaddafi had to  resort to coded messages to contact his field units.  The state Libyan TV, mouthpiece of his ministry of truth, delivered these under the guise of voodoo magic sessions performed by a certain Dr Shakeer, a familiar and loathed public face of the regime.

Since he came to office, Gaddafi occasionally took liberty to deliver other statements of truth, even if they were not always easy to authenticate.  In order to convince simple Libyans that they enjoyed democracy, he claimed the Greek word somehow had to do with similarly sounding Arabic words which imply “sitting on chairs”.  He also went on record claiming that the name Obama actually came from the  Arabic name Abu Omama and that the word "desert"  somehow refers to his hometown Sirte. Last but not least, he claimed that long ago, a certain Sheikh Zubeir had emigrated to England to become  known as no less than  the  famous Shakespeare.

Sunday, May 15, 2011

مصير الثورة الليبية مرتبط بقراءة في تاريخ الثورات

التاريخ  الحديث مليىء بتجارب ثورات قامت ضد أحكام طاغية  لكن البعض منها نجح والبعض الآخر فشل  في تحقيق آمال شعوبها ولابد للثورة الليبية من قراءة كل الملابسات التي أدت إلى نجاح أو فشل هذه الثورات أو تلك في برنامجها حتى لاتقع في المحظور وفي مايلي بعض الأمثلة:
1.       الثورة الأمريكية استفادت من موجة التنوير الفكري الذي اجتاح أوروبا متمثلا في أفكار جون لوك و جان جاك روسو ومونت سيكيو وغيرهم و توجت  هذه الثورة بإعلان وثيقة الإستقلال عن انجلترا  سنة 1776 وبعد ذلك بإعلان الدستور ووثيقة الحقوق وقد تميزت هذه الثورة باعتماد التسامح الديني و وضع القوة العسكرية تحت إمرة السلطة المدنية وتغليب المصلحة العامة على المصلحة الخاصة كما أنها حظيت بقيادة أشخاص لم يسعوا إلى الكسب الشخصي فقد رفض جورج واشنطن أن يتقاضى راتبا لنفسه  مقابل قيادته لجيش التحرير  ضد الجيش الإنجليزي ولا مقابل توليه منصب رئيس الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية فيما بعد مما أعطى مثلا أعلى يحتذى به. الجدير بالذكر أن هذه الثورة مرت بصعوبات في بدايتها لا تختلف كثيرا عما تواجهه الثورة الليبية بما في ذلك اعتمادها على جبش مدني كانت تنقصه الخبرة و التدريب و  كذلك السلاح والتمويل وقد لجأ قادة الثورة الأمريكية إلى طلب المساعدة من فرنسا وغيرها من الدول الأوروبية لسد هذا النقص.
2.       الثورة الفرنسية انطلقت بهجوم العامة على حصن الباستيل وتحرير المساجين سنة 1789 وقد تأثرت بالثورة الأمريكية وكذلك أفكار التنوير المنتشرة آنذاك في أوروبا و كانت ردا شعبيا على الظروف الإقتصادية المتهاوية واستبدلت نظام الحكم الملكي و الإقطاعي و الكنيسي  في فرنسا بنظام جمهوري وبرلمان شعبي أثار سخط وتخوف الملكيات الإقطاعية في أوروبا.  لكن سرعان ما تحولت شعارات"الحرية والعدالة والأخوة" إلى حكم دموي يقوده روبسبيير الذي اعتمد سياسة المقصلة والتي راح ضحيتها الملك لويس السادس عشر نفسه الذي كان قد أسند الثورة الأمريكية ومن بعده آلاف الضحايا في ما عرف بسنوات الرعب. في الوقت نفسه ازدادت الأوضاع الإقتصادية سوءا وتعرضت فرنسا الجديدة لحملات خارجية مما أدى إلى سنوات من  الحروب والفوضى  انتهت باستيلاء نابليون بونابارت على مقاليد الأمور في البلاد.
3.       الثورة الرومانية  انطلقت باحتجاجات تيمشوارا ضد حكم الدكتاتور نيكولا شاوسسكو في نهاية سنة  1989 وسرعان ما انتقلت إلى العاصمة بوخارست حيث تم الزحف على قصر شاوسسكو وزوجته اللذين سرعان ما فرا على متن طائرة مروحية ما أن حطت بهما حتى تم اعتقالهما ومن ثم إعدامهما بعد محاكمة صورية سريعة وتجدر الإشارة هنا أن القذافي علق آنذاك على أحداث رومانيا  ناعيا صديقه الدكتاتور ومحذرا الشعب الليبي من مغبة أية محاولة شبيهة ووعد بسحقها  و سرعان ما سرقت هذه الحركة الشعبية والعفوية في رومانيا  من قبل فلول الحكم الشيوعي المخلوع تحت ما سمي بجبهة الإنقاذ الوطنية بقيادة إليسكو الذي رغم وعوده بعدم ترشيح نفسه مضى ليحكم رومانيا لسنوات عدة مستعيتا بالبلطجية ضد حركة الطلاب الاحتجاجية.
4.       الثورة الصومالية أطاحت بنظام سياد بري في بداية التسعينات بعد سنوات من الحكم الدكتاتوري المطلق وفق ما كان يسمى بتجربة "الإشتراكية العلمية" والتي قضت على الأخضر واليابس  في الصومال زد على ذلك سنوات من الحروب والجفاف أدت إلى انهيار اقتصادي شامل وقد لجأ بري إلى بعض الأساليب المشابهة لأساليب القذافي في مواجهة الثورة بما في ذلك تسميم آبار المياه والقضاء على مصادر الرزق للسكان و لإن نجحت الحركة الشعبية في إسقاط نظام بري إلا أنها  فشلت بعده في إقامة دولة نظرا لتغلغل الفكر القبلي و المتطرف وعدم توفر رؤيى موحدة وواضحة لبرنامج ما بعد سقوط  ذلك الدكتاتور.
5.       الثورات العربية المزامنة حاليا للثورة الليبية نجحت إلى حد ما في تونس ومصر  نظرا للحياد النسبي للجيش وكذلك لاعتمادها أسلوب المجتمع المدني النائي عن القبلية لكنها في نفس الوقت ما زالت تواجه مخاطر تسببها النعرات التي تذكيها فلول النظام السابق وربما أيضا جهات أجنبية تبحث عن مصالحها في كلا البلدين ثم  هناك ثورة اليمن التي ما زالت في أوجها والتي تستمد قوتها من انتهاجها مسارا سلميا رغم شراسة قمع السلطة لها و تستفيد في نفس الوقت من قيادة شبابية فعالة تبدو على درجة لا بأس بها من التنظيم والوعي وكذلك لدينا ثورة سوريا التي باتت تتنامى  سريعا و للأسف هي الأخرى تتعرض الآن لقمع مشابه للذي تعرضت وما زالت تتعرض له الثورة الليبية.